This is the second Plain Speaker report on the proposed hospital cuts that are scheduled for public consultation, starting at the end of February. If you’d like to find links to several other reports on different aspects of the proposals, they’re at the end of this report.
Here you can find out about:
- Lack of evidence that these proposed changes will deliver the required standard of care
- The danger of mixing up aspirational goals with political goals
- An outline of proposed cuts and changes to hospital services
- The loss of around 77 hospital beds
- More detail about the proposal to knock down Huddersfield Royal Infirmary , sell the land and build a new 119 bed planned care clinic
- The Equality Impact Assessment conclusion that making all Calderdale & Kirklees people go to Huddersfield for planned care could “cause a negative impact”
- What planned care services everyone would have to travel to Huddersfield for
- Services that would be available at both hospitals
- Kirklees patients needing A&E would be sent to other “emergency care centres” – not necessarily Calderdale Royal Infirmary
- The Huddersfield urgent care centre (and other urgent care centres at Halifax and Todmorden) may not even be staffed by a doctor
- The Huddersfield planned care clinic/hospital would cut costs, through more day case and outpatients’ planned care, and shorter stay for inpatients
- Moving whole swathes of planned care services out of hospital
- Lack of information about the “financial case” for the hospital cuts and changes
Independent clinicians “in the dark” about standard of care if these cuts and changes happen
Lack of clarity in Calderdale and Greater Huddersfield NHS Commissioners’ Pre Consultation Business Case proposals for cutting and changing hospital services has left Clinical Senate doctors in the dark about the standard of care that would be available if these changes were to go ahead.
NHS Commissioners asked the Clinical Senate to review their proposals, specifically to
“answer questions regarding the ability of this model to deliver the standards proposed.”
But the doctors’ review says it can’t answer these questions, because
“The standards are…drawn from national documents but they are therefore very generic.”
